Market power versus efficiency defense in the European Commission's merger policy: Evidence on European airline mergers

  • According to microeconomics, mergers result in a more concentrated industry. This fact is hardly questionable, but the discussion about whether concentration is good or bad for society leads us to a lively debate, called the efficiency defense: do mergers increase market power or efficiency? How does merger policy take market power and efficiency into consideration? My work investigates the circumstances and consequences of merger appraisal in passenger airline markets in Europe between 1995 and 2015. The analysis tries to identify the role of consolidation driven by market power, efficiency and bankruptcy. The thesis introduces economic principles, models and policy choices behind the efficiency defense, and explains why the European Commission did not consider efficiency as a core criterion for their decision to allow or prevent takeovers. In summary, efficiencies could be considered in the merger process under the total welfare approach, which also contains efficiency gains from producer surplus increase. The author believes that efficiency is the ordinary aim of companies, but the reason behind mergers is to increase market presence, market share or with other words: market power. Competition policy should therefore improve a transparent and smart framework to regulate market power.

Download full text

Cite this publication

  • Export Bibtex
  • Export RIS

Citable URL (?):

Search for this publication

Search Google Scholar Search Catalog of German National Library Search OCLC WorldCat Search Catalog of GBV Common Library Network Search Catalog of Jacobs University Library Search Bielefeld Academic Search Engine
Meta data
Publishing Institution:IRC-Library, Information Resource Center der Jacobs University Bremen
Granting Institution:Jacobs Univ.
Author:Adél Németh
Referee:Gert Brunekreeft, Hans-Martin Niemeier, Julia Bendul
Advisor:Gert Brunekreeft
Persistent Identifier (URN):urn:nbn:de:gbv:579-opus-1005620
Document Type:PhD Thesis
Language:English
Date of Successful Oral Defense:2016/05/02
Date of First Publication:2016/05/31
Academic Department:Business & Economics
PhD Degree:Economics
Focus Area:Diversity
Library of Congress Classification:H Social Sciences / HD Industries. Land use. Labor [incl. Management] / HD2321-4730.9 Industry / HD3611-4730.9 Industrial policy. The state and industrial organization
Call No:Thesis 2016/11

$Rev: 13581 $